The subject of this evening's
meditation is Kronsteen, one of the supporting villains in From Russia
with Love (the second James Bond movie, released in 1963). He was played
by Vladek Sheybal, a slight and creepy-looking actor who in real life
was a member of the Polish resistance during World War Two.
In
the movie, Kronsteen was a chess master who moonlighted as an
operations planner for SPECTRE, the international agency of evil from
the Bond series. He designs a scheme to steal a Soviet decoding machine
and sell it to the highest bidder, tricking Bond into sneaking it out of
Istanbul.
Needless to say, the operation fails. Through
his usual blend of panache, skill and pure blind luck, Bond manages to
defeat the incompetent minions of SPECTRE field operative Rosa Klebb
(Lotte Lenya) and save the day.
Back at the evil overlord's
lair, the evil overlord calls Kronsteen and Klebb to account for the
failure. Having determined that Klebb caused the problem, overlord then has Kronsteen killed.
I first saw this movie when I was a kid,
and that moment made me extremely angry. For starters, Kronsteen was a
skinny, dark-haired, spooky-looking guy who was too smart for his own
good, which naturally meant that I identified with him. But more than
that, the guy did his job. His plan was perfect. Klebb fucked it up.
Shouldn't she be the one to get the poison boot blade to the leg?
When
I got older, I understood this a lot more. The failure was Kronsteen's
for not producing a plan that would take Klebb's failure into account.
It isn't enough to do your own job. You also have to be accountable for
the failures of the people you have to work with. Your plan isn't
perfect until it takes all possible breakdowns into account.
Plus
at that point if you're going to salvage what you can from a busted
operation you really need a field operative more than a strategy guy.
Thus Klebb has to stay in the game. Possibly unfair, but logical and practical
nonetheless.
I think more and more we're all facing our own
personal Bonds and Klebbs, “challenges” who have the devil's own luck on their
sides. There's no way to plan around them, nothing we can do that will
put contingencies in place for all the world's possible fuck-ups. And as
failure upon failure mounts up in our lives, it becomes such an
overwhelming tide of dysfunction that it's almost enough to make one
long for the sweet nepenthe of a swift poison boot blade to the leg.
Tuesday, September 22, 2015
In memory of Kronsteen
Monday, September 7, 2015
Sunday, September 6, 2015
Review – Ex Machina
I can’t help but think that movies like this would benefit greatly from any kind of hint of a sense of humor. I suppose a drama about the ethics of artificial intelligence might by nature be a bit grim. But something light-hearted here and there might break up the monotony a bit. And if all the characters are completely humorless, it tends to create the impression that everyone in the movie – not just the female cyborg undergoing an elaborate Turing test – is a robot. As the audience is expecting some kind of squirrelly twist like that anyway, there’s no point in fueling the expectation. Studio backing gives this indie picture a slick look and feel, but the underlying story is still amateurish and dull. Mildly amusing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)