This could have been a much better movie. I was already familiar with the history of this infamous anti-Semitic hoax, though the historical background part of the production might have been more useful to viewers who didn’t already know it. The director’s personal history was self-indulgent in an NPR sort of way and could easily have been cut. Slightly more interesting – though still pretty predictable – were the standard cast of Holocaust deniers and conspiracy theorists who think the Jewish people who worked in the World Trade Center were secretly warned not to report to work on Sept. 11. Though the counterpoint from a Holocaust survivor and an official from the NYC coroner’s office supplies solid emotional content, I can’t help but feel that by now it should really be beneath the dignity of a responsible film-maker to have to refute racist stupidity. Thus my favorite part of this production was the consideration of the role the Protocols are playing in the current unrest in West Asia. And here far too little is made of the inability of people on both sides of the conflict to draw lines between Jewish people in general and the Israeli government in particular. Overall this isn’t a terrible movie, but some additional shooting and a little re-editing could have made it into something truly worthwhile. Mildly amusing
Thursday, July 27, 2006
Review – Basic Instinct 2
Review – Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978)
This movie freaked me out when I was a kid. Back then it was all the cliché moments: the pods, the dog, the end. Upon this recent re-watching, I think my new favorite parts come mostly in the first half. The gooey boogers stuff is still cute, but I found it more fun to watch the slow, early signs of something not quite right. First it’s just a few people, then many, then the whole society. That’s a much better horror story than a sticky simulacrum of Donald Sutherland. The script and cinematography also include subtle touches that reward careful viewing. Worth seeing
Review – Beyond the Wall of Sleep
Saturday, July 22, 2006
Review – Chocolat
Thursday, July 20, 2006
Review – The Weather Underground
Aside from the annoying soundtrack music, this is a solid documentary about the white, upper-class end of leftist political violence in America in the late 60s and early 70s. Unfortunately – though perhaps accurately – the frivolous nature of the Weathermen comes out strongly from the early hippie days right on through the petering-out of the movement at the end of the Vietnam War; typical of the naiveté was the decision to avoid bombings that kill people only after some members of the group were killed by one of their own bombs. There are interesting things going on at the periphery of the narrative (particularly the parallel history of the Black Panthers), but the Weathermen themselves just didn’t turn out to be all that interesting. Mildly amusing
Wednesday, July 19, 2006
Review – The Night Strangler
It worked the first time. Let’s try it again. This is The Night Stalker moved from Nevada to the Pacific Northwest. The killer is a strange twist on the vampire theme, but otherwise all the elements of the original are right here where we left them. The only noteworthy addition is an exploration of the strange underground city beneath the streets of Seattle (a backdrop I still recall from the first time watching this movie on late night TV when I was a kid). Oh, and the supporting cast features some familiar faces, so keep an eye out. Mildly amusing
Review – The Night Stalker
Though the series spawned by this production turned out to be a somewhat uneven set, the original is immense fun. It’s a parade of clichés: the wild-eyed, crusading reporter, the hard-nosed editor, the arrogant bureaucrats, and of course the dark, European vampire. But the old saws are stuck together in ways that make some fresh cuts (or at least fresh by 1973 standards). Darren McGavin stars in one of the two roles that made him famous (the other of course being the dad in A Christmas Story). Muckraker Carl Kolchak bucks the system in order to prove that a string of murders in Las Vegas are the work of something more sinister than a garden-variety serial killer. Some of the scenes are nice and spooky in an early 70s sort of way, something I might like a bit more than I should because in the early 70s I was just the right age to be spooked by stuff like this. Mildly amusing
Monday, July 17, 2006
Review – Fabulous: The Story of Queer Cinema
Sunday, July 16, 2006
Review – The Assassination of Richard Nixon
Friday, July 14, 2006
Review – The Monster Club
Fans of the old English horror anthology pieces from the 60s and 70s can watch the sub-genre take one of its last breaths in this odd outing from 1980. In the bracket, John Carradine plays author R. Chetwynd-Hayes, the author upon whose works the vignettes are based. After a not-so-subtly-gay interlude with vampire Vincent Price, our two new-found friends retire to a nightclub for monsters (or at least actors in monster masks that look like they might have been ordered from the back pages of Fangoria). There Price spins his tales, punctuated by bizarre musical performances by the likes of UB40 (not to mention a strip tease with a surprise ending). The stories themselves are a mixed bag. The second one was a little too silly for my taste. The first and third were more effective (particularly the ghoul drawings in number three), but both were damaged a bit by the inclusion of dorky monster names (a “shadmock” in the first and a “hum-goo” in the third). Then in the end Price gets to make a heavy-handed but nonetheless thought-provoking speech about the relationship between horror stories and horror in real life. I can’t say if viewers who aren’t into this kind of thing will get much out of it, but genre fans should probably put this on their to-view lists. Mildly amusing
Review – Moby Dick (1956)
John Houston and Herman Melville were meant to be together. The director’s love of emoting and speechifying is tailor-made for the author’s grandiose, obsessive allegory of good and evil. Screenwriter Ray Bradbury does a fairly effective job of condensing the whale-sized novel down to a manageable two hours or so. Some of the whaling sequences make for difficult viewing, but at least they’re actually integral to the plot. My only real gripe here is that the technical aspects of the production are prosaic. More creative camerawork in particular would have been a real asset. Overall I suspect one needs to be in the proper state of mind before taking this on, but if the itch hits you then this will do a fine job of scratching it. Mildly amusing
Review – Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man’s Chest
Two things surprised me about this movie, though in retrospect neither of them should have. The first was how strongly it depended on the original. I went to see it with a friend who hadn’t seen the first one, and that helped make me acutely aware of all of the considerable number of moments where a joke or plot twist or even just a bit of dialogue was a reference to Curse of the Black Pearl. The second surprise was that after two and a half hours the ending was a weak set-up for yet another sequel. References to past and future productions aside, this stands up reasonably well as a fluffy bit of summer fun. The script isn’t as tight as the original, and Johnny Depp mails in his performance. But in exchange we get more extensive special effects and more elaborate fight sequences. Mildly amusing
Wednesday, July 12, 2006
Review – The Mephisto Waltz
You see it coming in the first five minutes. It happens in half an hour. And then on the movie goes on for more than an hour longer. The plot takes some entertaining twists and turns, but ultimately this is still pretty much a one-joke movie. The 70s-era production values lend a note of creepiness. Mildly amusing
Review – Blood Bath
Friday, July 7, 2006
Review – Deep Shock
Monday, July 3, 2006
Review – The Phantom of the Opera (1989)
It’s hard to think of this as anything but “The Freddy of the Opera,” and that isn’t just because Robert Englund stars as a villain with a horribly scarred face. The whole production has a late-80s slasher movie feel to it, which clashed unpleasantly with the traditional gothic trappings of the tale. Though the bulk of the production follows – more or less – the plot from the novel, the Leroux stuff is bracketed by a modern bit in which our heroine is knocked unconscious during a Broadway audition and dreams/remembers the bulk of the plot. This brought the “Dancing Cavalier” plot from Singin’ in the Rain so strongly to mind that this picture became even harder to take seriously. There’s enough Phantom here to make this vaguely entertaining, but the “innovations” this time around almost universally detract. Mildly amusing